Event

What happens when players rewrite the rules of economic simulation games instead of obeying them? By hacking classics like Hammurabi, Oregon Trail, and Lemonade Stand, this talk explores how code, ideology, and play form power cycles—and how breaking them turns market logic into creative resistance. Economic power hides in rules. Early home-computer “market simulators” such as Hammurabi, Oregon Trail, and Lemonade Stand encoded entire ideologies of productivity, scarcity, and profit into a few dozen lines of BASIC. They taught us how to play the economy — literally. But what happens when players stop following those rules and begin to rewrite them? This talk explores the power cycles inside these classic games: loops of control between player, program, and system. By modifying code, exploiting glitches, and bending rule sets, we can expose how computational models reproduce economic dogmas—and how small hacks can turn libertarian fantasies into playful counter-economies. Through live demonstrations and short historical dives, we’ll trace how the simple act of “cheating” becomes a tool of critique. Each intervention reveals a new feedback loop between code and ideology: where every CPU cycle becomes a site of political power. Can a hacked simulation still be fun? Can rewriting a game’s rules help us imagine different systems of value and exchange? Between nostalgia, code archaeology, and playful subversion, this session invites you to rethink what—and who—games simulate when we let the power cycle run differently.